poltchannel.blogg.se - Rule of rose fansite

Rule of rose fansite how to#

Thanks QuagmireDog 13:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC) Reply įansite link - what's going on with this guys? Seems to be an awful lot of edit-warring in-out cut/rename etc. When I've had the chance to absorb more details from VG FAs I'll make some changes. I've been unable to get online till literally a few minutes ago, but rest assured the comparison was eye-opening.

Sockatume 14:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC) Reply Food for thought. Compare to the Featured Article-grade page on MGS3. I mean, those who have not played the game know this stuff already, and for those who haven't, it's just a big list of spoilers they should avoid. The article should bring together a brief description, followed by outside sources' discussion of the game. QuagmireDog 04:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Reply Actually I don't think we need too much detail on the characters and how they attack and so on. Discussion about this would be appreciated, I'm a tweaker rather than a writer, but so many survival horror articles need to be fixed I'm having a go. I'll keep adding to the list (and striking through completed items).

Story needs expanding - bare bones might be good for a start? (It's going to be difficult, I know).

Alter character descriptions so they match the kind of layout and data given in the character lists of well established game articles.

come from? If anyone can point out where these 'aftermath' details came from I'd be extremely grateful. Where did information like 'Gregory was trained like a dog, Martha contacted the police about it several times' etc. Many of these did not match my play-through of RoR.

The article was mainly composed of lengthy 'character' subheadings which also combined different aspects of the story.

If you're unfamiliar with referencing (like me) (I was but now I'm OK, though I know it's tough if you're unfamiliar with referencing), please bring any good links you find here to the talk page. If it's open to interpretation, don't put it in - without adequate sourcing this is original research and can't be used.

The story section should be a brief outline.

Everything has to be spelled-out and unambiguous.

Encyclopedia articles are designed for those with little or no knowledge of the subject and surrounding subjects.

Managing these is going to be an ongoing task and potential pitfall during the article's continued evolution. The game itself has three 'realities' in effect, as well as interpretation of these events. The article's headings are now more or less as they should be.

I'm trying to brush the article up into a wikipedia entry, can you help? QuagmireDog 18:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Reply Anyhow, welcome to Wikipedia, hope you enjoy yourself whilst you contribute. The story section is going to be a real pain in the backside, as you've pointed out, I'm not sure how much material I'm going to be able to produce. However, your contributions managed to get my brain started and I've since written the gameplay section and incorporated your own text within it.

Rule of rose fansite how to#

I was however stumped at how to start, I've not had access to my PS2 for weeks and I'm not a writer.

I'd created a story and gameplay heading as they were missing from the article - it then consisted mainly of character sections and controversy/impact. Hi Vincent, if you want to sign your posts then just add four tildes (~) after you've finished typing. PS can anyone tell me how to get my signature to appear like everyone elses? I just got an account and I would appreciate it greatly. I am going to add a small blurb as a placeholder so that the story section is not just floating there. The story section is presently blank, probably because someone wanted to clean it up some.